#cannabisaficionado

Cannabis

The Endocannabinoid System and Clinical Endocannabinoid Deficiency

We spoke exclusively to Ethan Russo who believes that many common diseases stem from clinical endocannabinoid deficiency.

Published

on

Clinical Endocannabinoid Deficiency
Advertisement Back2Grow Advertisement

The discovery of the endocannabinoid system in the mid-1980s was a major breakthrough in modern medicine. Yet, if you looked at the curriculum for most medical schools, you might not know it. The finding would not have been possible without the help of the cannabis plant, which remains illicit in most countries around the world. After wide-spread legalization of medical cannabis and over three decades of research, knowledge about the endocannabinoid system and its associated pathologies, like clinical endocannabinoid deficiency, remain sorely overlooked.

The Endocannabinoid System: The Find of the Century?

Two decades before the discovery of the endocannabinoid system, a team of scientists led by Dr. Raphael Mechoulam, a professor of medical chemistry a the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, had finally isolated the primary psychoactive constituent of the cannabis plant—tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). After the discovery, researchers around the globe began the quest to figure out exactly how the compound worked.  A group led by Dr. Allyn Howlett, a neuroscientist then with St. Louis University, finally cracked the mystery: THC produced its psychoactive effects through engagement with specialized cell receptors.

A cell receptor can be thought of as a lock that is embedded on the surface of a cell membrane. These locks only respond to specific chemical keys. In this case, THC was the key that engaged a cannabinoid receptor. As research would soon reveal, cannabinoid receptors are part of a larger endocannabinoid system (ECS), a neurotransmitter and cell signaling network like none other.  Made up of receptor sites, their respective chemical activators, and the enzymes that deactivate these compounds, scientists quickly unveiled that the ECS was ubiquitous throughout the human body. Cannabinoid receptors are nearly everywhere — connective tissue, the brain, the spinal cord, internal organs, the digestive tract, the skin, and immune cells.

After what surely was many long hours in the lab, Howlett and her team landed on something big. Why on earth would these receptors be found in so many places? Nearly three decades down the line, scientists are still exploring the wide-reaching ramifications of the endocannabinoid system, Howlett included. In the time since its first discovery, the ECS has been found to be a potent regulator of brain activity, hormonal function, and immune response, linking the three main regulatory systems together. It’s this pervasive modulatory network that responds to THC and other cannabis constituents. When a person consumes intoxicating forms of cannabis, THC hijacks the cannabinoid receptor sites that are normally inhabited by compounds that the body produces naturally.

These compounds are called endocannabinoids. The prefix endo- refers to endogenous or internal cannabinoids. In contrast, the cannabinoids found on the cannabis plant are phytocannabinoids with the prefix phyto referring to plants. As it turns out, endocannabinoids are molecules that help maintain a state of equilibrium, or homeostasis, throughout the nervous, endocrine, and immune systems. Endocannabinoids play the part of harmonizers or middlemen, managing how each of these systems responds to stressful stimuli and communicates with the others.

Endocannabinoids are at least in part responsible for regulating the biological clock, managing things like hunger and sleep over the course of the day. Cannabinoid receptors are also highly concentrated in areas of the brain responsible for memory, emotion, and metabolism, giving them regulatory effects over a remarkable number of physiological functions. One endocannabinoid, called anandamide, even takes its name from the Sanskrit word for bliss Ananda thanks to its calming and relaxing effects.

With such a profound influence over so many basic bodily commands, it is now theorized that problems in the ECS may contribute to a wide variety of difficult-to-treat pathologies. These potential pathologies include ailments as diverse as migraines and autism.

Clinical Endocannabinoid Deficiency May Contribute to Disease

Howlett and Mechulam may have kicked off the first forays into the endocannabinoid system, but they are far from the only scientists who made serious contributions to this emerging arena of health and medicine. Back in 2001, Ethan Russo, a neurologist and medical researcher, first made the case for clinical endocannabinoid deficiency (CECD). Russo is currently the Director of Research and Development with the International Cannabis and Cannabinoids Institute (ICCI). His theory? That many common diseases stem from deficiencies of the endocannabinoid system.

“Many human disorders relate to deficiencies of neurotransmitter function,” Russo told Cannabis Aficionado. “We know that a lack of acetylcholine, the memory neurotransmitter, is key to dementia in Alzheimer disease and related disorders. Parkinson disease is associated with a lack of dopamine function. Depression is related to problems with serotonin.”

Now, Russo suggests that something similar could occur in the endocannabinoid system. “In 2001,” he explains, “I hypothesized that various human disorders could be related to a lack of endocannabinoids, the natural chemicals within our brain and bodies that are similar in activity to THC, the main psychoactive compound in cannabis.”

Since endocannabinoids have wide-spread functions in the body, a lack or deficiency of these signaling molecules could cause a whole host of trouble. Symptoms like seizures, mood troubles, and generalized pain, nausea, and inflammation are all possible side effects of an endocannabinoid imbalance. Further, the universal nature of the ECS means that ailments which are seemingly unrelated to each other may now be classified together under the endocannabinoid umbrella.

“The prime candidates for clinical endocannabinoid deficiency are migraine, fibromyalgia and irritable bowel syndrome,” says Russo, describing conditions that are currently thought of as distinct and separate pathologies. “All [three] have compelling evidence in the interim that there are deficiencies in endocannabinoid function. Additional evidence has accumulated to include post-traumatic stress, autism, and other disorders.”

It is the ECS that perhaps describes why conditions like migraine and irritable bowel syndrome may share so many overlapping symptoms, including changes in mood, digestive distress, pain, and fatigue. These problems may be genetic in nature or acquired over time. At least one scientist has even gone as far as to describe the endocannabinoid system as a “bridge between body and mind”, connecting the physical reality with an emotional and intellectual one.

Toward Recognition of the ECS

Researchers have been investigating the influence of the endocannabinoid system in disease pathology for the past 30 years. Despite advancements in our understanding about the ECS, however, therapies targeting the endocannabinoid system are still few and far between. While some cannabinoid-based therapies are available to select patients, medical cannabis still remains one of the primary therapies that targets the ECS.

Yet, while the herb has been immensely helpful to patients around the world, both cannabis and endocannabinoid research still suffers from underutilization and harsh political barriers to research. In fact, a 2018 study from the Washington School of Medicine found that only a meager nine percent of medical schools teach their students about medical cannabis. This is despite the fact that the medicinal use of the herb is legal in 33 U.S. states and all of Canada.

“In my opinion, the media attention [on the endocannabinoid system] is not yet sufficient,” says Russo, “as the scientific evidence behind the theory is now quite solid based on serum and cerebrospinal fluid tests and other data.” He is referring to tests conducted in patients with schizophrenia,  migraine, and epilepsy. In each of these conditions, patients exhibited a dysregulation of endocannabinoid molecules in their cerebrospinal fluid. In post-traumatic stress, scientists at the New York University Langone Medical Center made a similar finding back in 2013. Compared with controls, PTSD patients demonstrated reduced endocannabinoid circulation.

“Considering the extreme amount of suffering and economic costs associated with clinical endocannabinoid deficiency disorders, it is necessary to have better research support and clinical investigations,” he presses. Better research and support would enable medical researchers and other scientists to more efficiently establish key therapies and interventions for endocannabinoid disorders. “While it is clear that cannabis in one form or another can be very effective in treating such disorders, certain lifestyle approaches, such as low impact aerobic activity, and dietary manipulations with prebiotics and probiotics may also be effective.”

Unfortunately, nearly 75 percent of medical schools also fail to provide students with the required amount of nutrition education. In a world of quasi-legal remedies and underacknowledged illnesses, its past time that formal institutions look seriously into endocannabinoid health.

Cannabis

Israel’s Cannabis Trade Probe Moves Toward a Four-Producer Review

Israel’s latest procedural step puts four Canadian producers in focus, while the distinction between an investigation and an imposed trade duty remains essential.

Published

on

Shipping containers and cranes at a commercial port

Israel’s investigation of Canadian medical cannabis imports has reached another procedural stage, with four producers identified for closer examination, according to reporting on an October 22 notice. The development concerns how investigators will assess exporters. It does not, by itself, establish that dumping occurred or impose a new import duty.

Israel’s Cannabis Magazine reported that the trade-levies commissioner selected Koots Canna, 2323414 Alberta and Cielo Verde Quebec as a sample, with GrowCo to be examined separately. The outlet said it obtained the commissioner’s document. Cannabis Aficionado has reviewed the published reporting, rather than independently obtained that notice.

Why four producers are in focus

According to Cannabis Magazine, the three sampled growers represent about 22 percent of exports among the 16 indoor and hybrid growers that supplied data. GrowCo was singled out because of its greenhouse production and export volume. The report says the four together cover approximately 70 percent of Canadian cannabis imports into Israel during the relevant investigation period.

Those are descriptions of the proposed examination, not market-share figures that should automatically be applied to current retail sales. The reporting also describes a five-business-day response period for parties to comment. A reader should not mistake that opportunity to respond for a final ruling.

StratCann’s October 23 report adds that 22 Canadian companies supplied initial responses and 17 had exported during the investigation period. Its account says the commissioner considered individual calculations for every cooperating exporter impractical within the available time. Sampling is therefore central to this stage of the dispute.

What “dumping” means in this context

The World Trade Organization’s explanation of anti-dumping rules describes dumping as exports sold below their normal value, generally assessed against the exporting market. It is a trade-law pricing question. It is not an allegation that cannabis was contaminated, illegally cultivated or unsuitable for patients.

The comparison is more involved than placing two advertised prices side by side. The WTO describes adjustments that can be needed for differences in sale conditions, quantities, taxation and product characteristics. Its framework also requires consideration of material injury to a domestic industry and a causal link between that injury and dumped imports.

That makes production methods and comparable pricing relevant without making either conclusive. A greenhouse producer can have different costs from an indoor grower, but a cost difference alone does not settle all the questions required for an anti-dumping measure. The investigation has to establish the relevant facts through its process.

A dispute with several procedural turns

The latest review follows an earlier investigation that was closed in July. In a July 28 notice, Israel’s Ministry of Economy and Industry said the closure was for procedural reasons: advance notification had not been provided to the exporting country’s competent authority because of human error.

The ministry explicitly said that closure was not a substantive determination on the complaint. It also preserved the possibility of a further complaint or a new investigation. The distinction matters in both directions: closure did not establish that the allegations were correct, and it did not establish that they were disproven.

Cronos Group’s securities filing records a new complaint dated July 30, notification to Canada on August 2 and notice to the company on August 5 that a new investigation had begun. The company says it cannot predict the outcome or whether provisional or final duties will ultimately be imposed.

The filing also traces the earlier case to January 2024 and describes the finance minister’s opposition to the proposed duty in April 2025. It records subsequent court challenges as well. That history helps explain why earlier proposed tariff percentages should not be presented as the rate established by the October 2026 sample-selection step.

What changes for readers and businesses now

For businesses, the immediate development is a more specific picture of which exporters may receive detailed scrutiny. It is not enough information to calculate a new landed cost, predict a supplier’s future prices or announce an interruption to patient supply. Those claims would require additional evidence.

For patients and other readers, an investigation headline should remain separate from a product-safety headline. Nothing in this procedural selection establishes a health finding about a named producer’s cannabis. Nor does it establish a new prescription rule.

The next substantive items to watch are the commissioner’s treatment of responses to the sample, any published preliminary determination and any resulting measure. Reports available for this article describe sample selection, with no preliminary duty decision reported at that stage. Until a later document changes that position, the appropriate description is an unresolved trade investigation.

Illustrative stock trade photograph; not a documented cannabis shipment or an Israeli port. Photo: Andrea Musto / Pexels.

Continue Reading

Cannabis

New Zealand Cannabis Trial Takes a Longer Look at Sleep and Back Pain

A small University of Auckland study will compare a cannabis oil with placebo over months, separating an important research question from claims of proven benefit.

Published

on

Woman resting on a white pillow in a bedroom

Can a cannabis medicine improve sleep for people living with chronic back pain over several months? A University of Auckland study is examining that question, with a recent update from medicine supplier Helius drawing attention to an ongoing trial that has yet to report results.

The CPS trial is designed to compare a THC–CBD oil with placebo in approximately 20 adults. Its value lies in the comparison and the follow-up period: the research asks whether improvements hold up beyond an initial experience with a product, rather than treating a personal account of better sleep as proof.

An ongoing study, not a new treatment finding

In its October update, Helius describes a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Participants are to receive the medicine for three months and placebo for three months, in a randomly assigned order. The company says it provides the study products but has no role in conducting the research, analyzing the data or reporting the findings.

Helius expects results in early 2028. That is a projected reporting window, not a completed result or a promise that the product will work. The announcement should also be distinguished from the trial’s start: the registry records a first participant enrollment date in October 2025.

What the researchers will measure

The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry entry identifies change in the Insomnia Severity Index as the primary outcome. Additional measures include pain scores and wrist-monitor estimates of total sleep time, time awake after falling asleep, sleep efficiency and the time taken to fall asleep.

Those measures address related but different experiences. Feeling that sleep has improved, spending longer asleep and reporting less pain are not interchangeable outcomes. Looking at them together can provide a more useful picture than a single headline about cannabis and sleep.

The registered design also includes a washout period between treatment phases. Because each participant receives both study products, the comparison follows the same person under different conditions. Randomizing the order helps reduce the risk that an improvement associated with time or treatment sequence is mistaken for a medicine effect.

What participation involves

The university’s recruitment page describes about seven months of participation, including questionnaires, urine testing and a wrist-worn sleep monitor. It seeks adults aged 25 or older with chronic back pain and sleep difficulties, subject to medical screening and approval from their general practitioner.

Eligibility is narrower than simply having a restless night. Other medicines and health conditions can affect suitability, and the researchers must assess those factors before enrollment. Readers interested in participating should use the university’s study contact to confirm current availability and requirements.

The public materials do not give a completely consistent visit schedule: the recruitment page mentions different visit totals in different sections. The registry was last updated in March 2026 and includes an anticipated recruitment endpoint that has passed. Those details make the study team the appropriate source for current logistics; they do not justify assuming that every advertised place remains available.

The registry lists the University of Auckland and the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists as funding sources. Identifying funding and product supply separately helps readers understand who supports the project and who is responsible for its scientific work.

Safety and consent remain part of the research

The participant information sheet names the University of Auckland as sponsor and Dr. Saad Anis as lead researcher. It describes the study oil as Helius THC10:CBD10 Full Spectrum and explains that the placebo does not contain THC or CBD.

The document emphasizes voluntary participation. Declining to join or withdrawing does not affect normal care, and participation may bring no direct benefit. Its screening requirements cover potentially interacting medicines and conditions that could increase side-effect risks, among other exclusions. This is supervised research, rather than a recommendation to copy a study regimen at home.

Quality standards do not answer the efficacy question

New Zealand’s Ministry of Health distinguishes medicinal cannabis quality verification from medicine approval. Meeting the minimum quality standard concerns product quality and consistency; it does not make a product an approved medicine or establish that it treats a particular condition.

That distinction explains why controlled research still matters even where cannabis products can be prescribed. A standardized product gives investigators something defined to test. It does not supply the answer in advance.

With a target of only 20 participants and a specific patient group, the CPS trial will need to be read within its limits. Any eventual findings will concern the tested formulation, population and study conditions. For now, the news is the effort to build that evidence carefully, with the clinical answer still ahead.

Illustrative stock sleep photograph; the model is not identified as a patient or trial participant. Photo: Los Muertos Crew / Pexels.

Continue Reading

Cannabis

Rubicon’s $3 Million Raise Puts Greenhouse Lighting at the Center of Expansion

The Canadian producer plans to expand output from existing facilities, with a lighting project bringing its combined capacity target forward to June 2027.

Published

on

Potted plants beneath the glass roof of a greenhouse

Rubicon Organics is putting new capital into the lights above an existing crop rather than announcing another cultivation site. The Canadian producer’s October 19 financing announcement outlines a roughly $3 million private placement intended to support lighting and related greenhouse infrastructure at its Pacifica facility in Delta, British Columbia.

The company expects the project to help bring combined annual capacity at Pacifica and its Cascadia facility to 20,000 kilograms by June 2027, about a year earlier than previously anticipated. That is a production target. Whether additional capacity becomes profitable, saleable flower will depend on execution, operating costs and demand.

What the financing is intended to fund

According to Rubicon’s announcement, Siwash Rock Investments subscribed for 6,666,667 common shares at $0.45 each. Proceeds are intended for the lighting project, with the balance going to working capital.

Rubicon says Pacifica’s annual capacity could reach 15,500 kilograms after the upgrade, a 40 percent increase at that facility. The 20,000-kilogram figure refers to both sites together. Those two numbers describe different scopes and should not be added together. Final TSX Venture Exchange acceptance remained outstanding in the announcement.

The operating background behind the project

Rubicon’s second-quarter results, released in August, provide context for the expansion. The company reported net revenue of C$18.5 million, up 23 percent year over year, while adjusted EBITDA fell 18 percent to C$1.1 million. Adjusted EBITDA is the company’s nonstandard earnings measure, not net profit.

Management attributed pressure on profitability to the ramp-up of Cascadia even as revenue grew. It also reported that Pacifica’s per-crop yield metrics had increased approximately 20 percent in the first half of 2026 compared with a year earlier.

Those disclosures show why output and earnings need to be examined separately. A business can sell more while still absorbing the expense of bringing a facility to its intended performance. The lighting investment adds another operational milestone to watch alongside the company’s reported financial results.

The August report put combined capacity at 15,500 kilograms before the planned lighting expansion. That earlier baseline helps clarify the October target: the same figure later describes Pacifica alone, while the combined target rises to 20,000 kilograms.

Why growers pay attention to lighting

There is a research basis for studying how additional light affects cannabis production. A 2022 study in Frontiers in Plant Science tested the THC-dominant cultivar Meridian under different light intensities in an indoor environment. Dry flower weight was higher under the strongest tested photosynthetically active light treatment than under the lowest.

However, the study found no corresponding effect of those intensity treatments on cannabinoid concentrations in the flower. Its ultraviolet treatments also provided no commercially relevant benefit under the tested conditions. More flower and stronger flower were separate questions.

The researchers cautioned that responses vary with genotype and production environment. Their findings explain why light is a serious cultivation variable; they do not independently verify Rubicon’s projected 40 percent increase. A controlled indoor experiment is not a performance test of Pacifica’s greenhouse or its proposed equipment.

The experiment also illustrates why a lighting announcement should identify what success means. In this case, increased dry flower weight did not demonstrate increased flower cannabinoid concentration, even though both measures could matter commercially.

The energy bill belongs in the calculation

A 2021 PLOS ONE study by Utah State University researchers makes another useful distinction. In experiments with medical hemp, the team compared lighting spectra and fixture efficiency. A tested white-and-red LED treatment produced slightly less flower per unit of growing area than a high-pressure sodium treatment, but more flower per dollar of electricity.

The authors concluded that fixture efficacy and upfront cost could matter more to investment returns than spectral distribution at high light levels. Their study also found no effect of spectral quality on CBD or THC concentration under its conditions.

For readers following a greenhouse upgrade, the practical implication is that kilograms alone cannot describe the result. Equipment cost, electricity use and the amount of usable production obtained from that energy all belong in the evaluation. Those research findings are background, not a specification for Rubicon’s project.

For broader demand context, our coverage of Canada’s August retail sales explains why national spending and an individual producer’s performance answer different questions. A market record does not validate a particular expansion forecast.

What will show whether the expansion works

The most useful follow-up will connect construction progress with actual operating results: whether the equipment is installed on time, whether yields improve consistently and whether the additional flower supports sales without eroding margins. Those are checkpoints, rather than outcomes established by the financing.

For cultivators, Rubicon’s plan offers a concrete example of pursuing more output within existing infrastructure. For consumers, the announcement does not guarantee a change in potency, availability or shelf price. The capital has been raised; the production and commercial results still have to follow.

Illustrative stock greenhouse photograph; not Rubicon’s Pacifica facility or a cannabis crop. Photo: Albina White / Pexels.

Continue Reading

Trending

Join The Cannabis Aficionado Community!
Join the Cannabis Aficionado community and receive all of the most relevant news geared towards our sophisticated enthusiast community.
Loading

Copyright ©️ 2026 Cannabis Aficionado. Cannabis Aficionado is a registered trademark of CNM Inc. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Cookies Policy. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services. Offers may be subject to change without notice.