#cannabisaficionado

Culture

Cannabis Legalization IS a Civil Rights Issue

Social equity is important to help people of color move on from the racist inquisition of cannabis prohibition. It’s a Civil Rights issue.

Published

on

Civil Rights
PHOTO | Alex Brandon
Advertisement Back2Grow Advertisement

Americans have the right to political and social freedom and equality, as guaranteed by the Constitution. But reflecting on how this country was founded, there is no doubt the reason the U.S. is a superpower today is because the colonists and subsequent immigrants who became the industrialists had free labor through ownership of slaves to build their homesteads, ranches, companies and corporations.

The country would never have the infrastructure it does in terms of roads, buildings and power supplies if it was not for slave labor of people of color. This incomprehensible display of racism has attributed to the empires of American families with names like Rockefeller, Forbes, Vanderbilt and Griswold, to name only a few. The freedom of slaves and later the civil rights movement were pivotal moments of liberty for American people of color, who were not given the same rights to political and social freedom and equality that the Constitution guaranteed.

The legalization of cannabis can also create a huge shift in the Civil Rights of Americans.

Cannabis, Civil Rights and Reefer Madness

After the Civil War, the Jim Crow laws enacted racial segregation and the legal principle “separate but equal.” This carried into schooling, transportation and public facilities. Not until 1954, when the landmark decision in Brown vs. Board of Education was handed down, did segregation become unconstitutional. Though it took years to implement the decisions, the Supreme Court continued to hand down rulings against the Jim Crow laws. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were the last laws to help overturn the institutional discrimination.

However, during this period, in 1942, the Japanese Internment took place and people were suspected of committing crimes against the country during WWII solely because of their Japanese ancestry. The abusive move by the American government to substitute race and national origin for evidence is today recognized as shameful and a horrific event in our country’s history. The admission a sign that times are changing.

While laws and policy remove these intolerable acts of American racism on paper, the psychology and education for reform within people is taking longer to change. Decades after the Civil Rights Act was passed, many are still being targeted for the color of their skin, often being stopped at airports, pulled over in traffic and experiencing Constitutional violations of the 4th Amendment, for search and seizure. Official denials and insufficient proof have upheld these behaviors.

Again, in a country not above using skin color as evidence, the prohibition of cannabis in the mid-1930s started a wave of incarceration for people of color who use, grow, or sell marijuana. Harry Anslinger, the first commissioner of the U.S. Treasury Department’s Federal Bureau of Narcotics, made it his mission to seek out jazz musicians who used ‘marihuana.’ His internal memos berated jazz, reading, “It sounded like the jungles in the dead of night.” A different memo cautioned, “Unbelievably ancient indecent rites of the East Indies are resurrected.” And that the lives of jazz players “reek of filth.” He hoped to round up all-black jazz musicians and famously went after singer Billy Holiday for her heroin use — while helping white actress Judy Garland with her “troubled addiction” to heroin and wouldn’t dare arrest her.

“Prohibition was always used to eliminate people from this society and make it harder for them. It was part of the greater effort to continue what our country was unfortunately built on, slavery,” shared Allison Margolin, a Los Angeles-based criminal defense and cannabis attorney who has been heavily involved with California cannabis licensing and criminal drug cases.

Systemic racism leftover from the founders of this country gave way to modern racial profiling by law enforcement and the judiciary courts. The drug war greenlit in the 1980s increased the Jim Crow hysteria for cannabis tenfold, as rogue policy led to training DEA agents to look for people of color to pull over, especially if they’re black and driving expensive cars.

Cannabis was villainized by ‘reefer madness’ and in its own Jim Crow nightmare — no matter the American right to control our body and mind, covered in the opening words of the Declaration of Independence, which guarantees “right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Freedom of thought is also guaranteed by the first amendment. The prohibition of cannabis was unconstitutional from the get-go.

But, evolution pushes at humanity and while today humans are under attack by their own species, many people are choosing a higher consciousness over slavery. Prohibition can’t be justified on moral or legal ground. The American Medical Association and the Federal Drug Administration have denied the truth about drugs when they come in conflict with government policies and corporate agendas, but thanks to democracy, cannabis is being freed from illegality and stigma, one state at a time. In a groundbreaking national effort, on November 19th, 2019, The House Judiciary Committee voted 24-10 to advance the Marijuana Opportunity, Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act, sponsored by Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY). If passed by Congress, the U.S. is looking at ending federal cannabis prohibition completely.

The MORE Act would remove marijuana from the list of federally controlled substances, authorize the provision of resources, funded by an excise tax on marijuana products, to address the needs of communities that have been most seriously impacted by the war on drugs and provide for the expungement of federal marijuana convictions and arrests.

First Nations people, the Native Americans who lived in North America before the Europeans invaded, have begun to open dispensaries and cultivation businesses on their reservations. With sovereign immunity from the U.S., the MORE Act will only change things slightly. Josh Grant, IIPAY Tribe member and Chairman of the Santa Ysabel Tribal Development Corporation, explained, “Let’s say the Fed pass the MORE Act and they put regulations in place, now do we want to give up our sovereign immunity and start operating on federal regulations? Do we want to waive our sovereign immunity and start functioning on state regulation? Probably not. Do we want to make our own regulations that fold these other ones in? Yes, we do.”

Not All Social Equity is Created Equal

Racial profiling is responsible for putting many people of color behind bars for cannabis. Expungement may be a huge win for America but what about reparations? While 40 acres and a mule was a Civil War promise never realized, Native Americans have long suffered in displacement and Mexicans completely shunned in the face of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo, cannabis legalization in many states has promised to develop and implement policies that seek to center equity in cannabis policy reform.

Grant shares how deep these reforms are needed for First Nations people.

“What about tribal sovereignty and our ability and our inherent right to provide for our people by any means necessary? When we have elders without power and their houses are falling apart, when we have children without housing, without heat, without running water, when we have third-world conditions on our reservation, shouldn’t we be allowed under our tribal sovereignty to provide an economic plan to try to help these people with the proper dispersal of profit or income to cover the tribe? There’s a major civil right.

“What they’re violating is our tribal sovereignty by restricting us from having a free market to develop our resources to provide for our people. That’s first and foremost here. We’re talking first nations here; we’re talking first people. We’ve been pushed into a corner of worthless land, while the bulk of our territory has been taken and government entities are collecting taxes on that land without remitting a portion of those taxes back to the original people.”

Social equity programs hope to repair the damage done by the war on drugs and assist equitable ownership and employment opportunities in the cannabis industry to decrease disparities in low-income and marginalized communities.

Margolin explained the importance of social equity within the legalization framework, “I think that it’s one of the first times that any of the governmental bodies in the United States has chosen attempt at reparations in any kind of way shape or form. I think there’s obviously a lot that could be done to try to increase the power of social equity applicants. Most of those have to do with access to banking, not having to rely upon individuals or potential conglomerates who might make deals that aren’t like the best, but its better than nothing. It’s definitely a good beginning.”

But is social equity working? While all legal states do not have the same social equity programs, at the local level, cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles are trying to set up stronger programs to combat the barriers to enter the cannabis business and offer employment and business ownership opportunities.

Allison Margolin commented on the effectiveness of Los Angeles Social Equity Program,

“There’s social equity issues that will arrive, like we had this whole thing with the electronic first come, first serve, that became a situation and had levels of unfairness. But I think that if we fairly increase the number of dispensaries allowed, there’s no cap and we relax in the sensitive use requirements and if the state has certain requirements for the social equity on the local level that’d be great. Also, if the state-mandated there wouldn’t be a dry county, we could fix this huge disparity between the philosophy of before — the philosophy that’s supposed to be underpinning all of this and going on in these local governments, which is like reefer madness.

“Without the local governments being on board right now we don’t have too much access and that affects the whole market. We need to have more retail. We need to have more state-mandated social equity ownership requirements. But even with those things, yes, people can make money but there are a lot of control issues and the ability to control the market. Otherwise social equity can have benefits.”

States like Illinois and Massachusetts made social equity an integral part of their cannabis legalization. In states that didn’t, like Oregon, the city of Portland stepped up and granted eligibility for reduced license fees to businesses whose owners or staff had previous marijuana convictions; and in 2016, they enacted a city marijuana sales tax to generate funds for economic and education programs in communities where drug laws were disproportionately enforced.

Finding a happy medium for reparations can make sure who is supposed to benefit does, but there are many ways to create categories that were maybe not defined outright. For example, in Los Angeles, there is a three-tier social equity program with many different qualifications and benefits. A workforce requirement has a good faith effort to employ 50% of the weekly hourly workforce from the residents living within a three-mile radius of the cannabis business premises, with 20% social equity workers and 10% transitional workers. There are ways to make opportunities for everyone.

The Importance of Social Equity

Just as vital to understanding that legalization is a civil rights issue, is to be aware of the campaign of disinformation by the government. America is a nation with so many elephants in the room. It’s a zoo. Conscious evolution aside, changes can be made through policy and social equity is a good start.

“Reparations need to happen in the country in order for the United States to survive. Basically, this can be a good beginning to how we start it,” Margolin said. The people who have gone to prison for cannabis had to hire attorneys, had to be bailed out and they lost their jobs. “There should be a way for those people to benefit first economically. In addition to all these laws, the financing needs to be opened up, so passing state and federal banking is part of the effort because then you can have government-mandated funds and specialty programs. But now, you’re basically on your own unless you’re part of a bigger conglomerate, which might be like a big management company or otherwise you’re just in not of good positioning power,” she added.

Social equity is important to help people of color move on from the racist inquisition of cannabis prohibition. Margolin expressed that her grandparents were Holocaust survivors and received reparations from the Germans during her entire life. “They weren’t bitter towards Germans. They had no issues with Germans. Actually they’re both from Poland and they never went back there because they said there was so much anti-Semitism, but they went to Germany.”

The emotional and psychological trauma of racism is a scar this entire nation will carry until it can become completely transparent and make amends. Cannabis legalization is a gigantic step towards equality for all.

Margolin adds, “Basically the drug war and the war with cannabis has always been about taking things that are basic human needs and basic human impulses, which are the right to alter our consciousness on a level that’s pretty nuanced and not bad for you and punishing people for something most everyone does or that many people do.”

Culture

Four Museum Programs to Put on Your November 1 Calendar

From an ofrenda in Los Angeles to art-making on the Bowery, these November 1 museum programs offer a creative start to the month.

Published

on

Visitors viewing paintings in a gallery with turquoise and purple walls in São Paulo

The morning after Halloween does not have to mean putting creativity away. On Sunday, November 1, 2026, museum programs in New York, Philadelphia and Los Angeles offer ways to keep looking, listening and making. Some are geared toward families, some welcome all ages, and each offers a different point of entry into art and cultural traditions.

These are upcoming programs drawn from the institutions’ own calendars, not reports from events that have already happened. The dates are close enough to start planning now, but admission conditions differ. A free activity can still sit inside a museum that charges admission, and a festival’s hours do not necessarily match the building’s full opening day.

New York: make something on the Bowery

The New Museum’s fall program announcement lists Family Day for November 1, from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m., in its Sky Rooms North and South. The program offers free admission for families with children, gallery exploration using a Kids’ Guide and opportunities to make art together. Its stated audience is families with children ages 4–12.

The museum also lists another Family Day for December 6, making the November event one option in a continuing series. Storytime takes place on selected Sundays, but the announcement directs visitors to check the current schedule. It would be a mistake to assume that every activity mentioned across the fall calendar happens during this particular visit.

For a family outing, the useful feature is the combination of looking and doing. Rather than asking children to move quietly through an entire building, the program gives them a reason to make choices and create something themselves. Check the museum’s event calendar before leaving for any updated entry instructions.

Philadelphia: light, color and movement

At the Philadelphia Museum of Art’s Light the Way festival, November 1 programming runs from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. in the Main Building. The museum describes it as a celebration of the Festival of Lights and Southeast Asian artworks, with participation included in Pay What You Wish admission.

The schedule provides several different ways to join in. Lantern-making and a sensory-friendly quiet zone run throughout the event. From 11 a.m. to 2 p.m., visitors can make light catchers and collaborate on rangoli patterns in the South Indian Temple Hall. Bollywood fusion dance performances by Philly Dance Fitness are scheduled for 2 p.m.

That timetable makes it possible to choose a shorter visit around a particular activity. It also gives a group options when people want different levels of stimulation: the quiet zone is a practical part of the program, rather than an afterthought. Confirm admission arrangements directly with the museum.

Los Angeles: remembrance through music and plants

The Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County has a Día de los Muertos celebration scheduled for November 1 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. The museum’s calendar specifies that the program is free with paid museum admission and for members. It includes live music, hands-on activities and an interpretive ofrenda honoring departed loved ones.

The ongoing program includes a floral display made with Latinx with Plants, where visitors can add a message for someone they wish to honor. The museum frames the day around remembrance and community, reflecting a tradition observed in Mexico and elsewhere in Latin America.

Approach that invitation with the meaning of the occasion in view. An ofrenda is not interchangeable with Halloween decoration. Reading the interpretation and following guidance from the organizers can make the visit more thoughtful, whether the tradition is part of your own family life or something you are learning about.

Los Angeles: design a different future at LACMA

LACMA’s Andell Family Sundays offers a November 1 drop-in workshop inspired by Home of the Future, 1925–1985: Designing Domestic Utopias. Artists Bianca Argueta and Karl Petion lead the all-ages activity outside the W.M. Keck Education Center, with the calendar listing W.M. Keck Plaza and a 12:30–3:30 p.m. window.

The workshop is listed as free. The same page separately describes family gallery tours that require museum admission, so visitors should distinguish the outdoor activity from a ticketed gallery visit. Related workshops return November 8 and 15, offering alternatives if this Sunday is already full.

LACMA’s page also flags a Metro D Line closure at Wilshire/Fairfax through November 1, with bus service available. Anyone relying on that station should use the linked transit information to check the day’s route before setting out.

Choose the program that fits your city and interests, then confirm its current listing. Together, these calendars offer a useful reminder that a museum visit can involve making, memory, sound and movement as well as looking at objects behind glass.

Illustrative stock gallery in São Paulo; not one of the museums or November 1 events described. Photo: Andre Moura / Pexels.

Continue Reading

Cannabis

Kansas Survey Finds Majority Support for Cannabis Reform, With Medical Access Ahead

The new Kansas Speaks survey finds 65% support for medical legalization and 58.3% for recreational use. Those are public attitudes, not a change in law.

Published

on

White ballot box marked Vote with an American flag design

A new Kansas Speaks survey finds majority support for legalizing both medical and recreational cannabis, with medical access attracting the larger share. The results offer a measure of public sentiment ahead of the next policy debate; they do not announce a legalization measure or establish when one might pass.

Fort Hays State University’s Docking Institute of Public Affairs released the survey on October 26. Its public-affairs panel included 603 Kansas residents aged 18 and older. Cannabis was one of several subjects, alongside taxation, economic conditions, health policy and other state issues.

Medical and recreational support are different findings

The full report records 65 percent support and 15.3 percent opposition to medical marijuana legalization in general. For recreational legalization, 58.3 percent supported and 21.3 percent opposed. Both support figures combine stronger and more moderate responses.

That distinction matters because medical access and an adult-use market are different policy questions. Support for one does not tell lawmakers how respondents would answer every detail of the other, including who could sell products, how purchases would be taxed or which products would qualify.

The report also found 59.3 percent highly or somewhat likely to vote for a Kansas legislative candidate who supports medical legalization. That is a stated inclination attached to one issue. It is not a forecast that any named candidate will win, and it does not show how respondents ultimately balance cannabis against other concerns.

Who was surveyed, and when?

Fieldwork ran from September 23 through October 16. The institute used a Qualtrics online panel with demographic quotas, then weighted responses by age, gender, education and party registration. The report retained people who were not registered voters.

Readers should therefore describe the findings as a survey of adults, rather than substitute “likely voters.” Those populations answer different questions: public attitudes include people who may not vote, while an election forecast tries to anticipate the electorate that actually turns out.

Weighting is a statistical adjustment to the influence of different responses. It does not mean the researchers interviewed additional people after collection ended. The original number of participants and the weighted analytical total should not be treated as competing headcounts.

The Roper Center’s guide to polling transparency explains why disclosures about recruitment, population, collection methods and timing help readers judge whether a poll fits a particular purpose. Publishing those details enables scrutiny; disclosure by itself does not guarantee accuracy.

A percentage is not the whole policy argument

For cannabis readers, the useful starting point is the exact question. “Medical marijuana legalization in general” leaves many implementation choices open. A proposal with a defined patient program, licensing structure and product restrictions would present respondents with more information than that broad phrase.

Likewise, opposition is not automatically the remainder after subtracting support from 100. Where a questionnaire permits a middle or uncertain response, treating everybody outside the supporting group as an opponent exaggerates the division. The published support and opposition figures should be reported separately.

AAPOR’s guidance on polling uncertainty also distinguishes conventional sampling margins from model-dependent credibility intervals used with some online polls. The terms cannot simply be exchanged. This article does not assign an unsupported margin of error to the Kansas results.

Those limits do not make the survey uninformative. They define its contribution: a documented set of responses about broad cannabis questions during a stated period, rather than a guarantee about a future vote or legislative outcome.

A comparison with another poll also needs matching definitions. A survey asking about medical access for specified conditions is not asking precisely the same thing as general legalization. Differences in wording, field dates and the population sampled can matter before any apparent movement is interpreted as a change of mind. The safest comparison begins with the questionnaires, rather than two percentages taken out of their reports.

Public support and lawmaking follow separate paths

The Kansas Legislature’s explanation of its process shows the institutional steps a bill normally faces. Committee consideration and chamber votes precede agreement on identical language in both houses, followed by the governor’s role. A proposal’s effective date is another separate matter.

That means a poll release is not a substitute for checking a bill’s text, amendments and official status. An introduced measure, a committee recommendation and a signed law describe different stages, even if advocates cite the same public-support figures at each one.

The strongest reading of this survey is also the most specific. Medical legalization leads recreational legalization in the reported responses, and both have majority support among surveyed Kansas adults. Whether that support becomes an enacted program depends on decisions this survey did not make: the legislation’s contents, the votes and the implementation timetable.

Illustrative stock voting display; not a Kansas polling place or a cannabis ballot measure. Photo: Sora Shimazaki / Pexels.

Continue Reading

Cannabis

Rooted and ReLeaf Set October 30 Grand Opening in Eldersburg

The already-operating Liberty Road dispensary plans a Friday celebration, with a 1 p.m. ribbon cutting and a standing military discount.

Published

on

Small-town main street with American flags and parked vehicles

Rooted, a collaboration with ReLeaf Shop, will hold its Eldersburg grand opening on Friday, October 30, giving Carroll County customers a date to meet the people behind a store that is already operating. The event is a formal celebration, rather than the first day the dispensary begins serving shoppers.

In an October 27 announcement, the business scheduled opening remarks for 12:50 p.m. and a ribbon cutting for 1 p.m. at 1337 Liberty Road. The partnership brings together Rooted founder Andrae McEnnis, a 20-year military veteran, and ReLeaf Shop CEO Connor Whelton.

The organizers list barbecue from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. and again from 4 to 7 p.m., a photo booth from 1 to 4 p.m., and a DJ from 4 to 7 p.m. Regular store hours are 9 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily. These are the business’s announced plans; visitors should confirm details before travelling.

A community event and a regulated store

A grand-opening program can make a dispensary feel like another neighborhood business. Purchasing cannabis still involves specific rules. The Maryland Cannabis Administration’s adult-use guidance says customers must be at least 21 and show valid government-issued photo identification at the point of sale.

The agency identifies licensed dispensaries as the legal place to buy cannabis in the state. It also separates adult-use purchasing from the medical program, which continues with accommodations intended to preserve patient access, including dedicated service lines or patient-only hours.

For visitors, the practical question is which service they need when they arrive. A ribbon cutting, an online order and a medical pickup are different reasons to visit, even when they share the same address. Checking the store’s current instructions avoids assuming the event program describes every part of the shopping process.

Maryland’s FAQ also prohibits smoking cannabis in public places and using it while driving. An event listing food and entertainment is not itself an invitation to consume on site. Planning transportation before using cannabis is part of making a visit workable, rather than something to decide after shopping.

The MCA also lists adult-use purchase limits by product form, including 1.5 ounces of flower, 12 grams of concentrates or 750 milligrams of THC in specified products. These are legal purchase amounts, not guidance about how much someone should consume.

Military discounts and medical status are separate

Rooted and ReLeaf say active-duty and retired military customers receive 25 percent off non-sale products every day. The announced offer is a standing store discount, not a one-day grand-opening promotion. Customers should check how the business verifies eligibility and which products qualify before assuming it applies to an entire order.

A veteran discount does not determine eligibility for Maryland’s medical cannabis program. The MCA’s patient guidance describes a separate registration process for Maryland residents whose providers recommend cannabis for qualifying conditions. It also allows registered patients to designate a registered caregiver under the program’s rules.

The same guidance says the cost of medical cannabis is not reimbursable by private or public insurance, Medicare, Medicaid or veterans’ covered plans. That makes the difference between a retail discount, a medical purchase and an insurance benefit especially relevant when comparing costs.

These distinctions do not diminish the value of a discount. They help a customer understand what the offer actually changes: the price of eligible merchandise, rather than their medical status, coverage or authorization to use cannabis in every setting.

The tax distinction matters at checkout

Maryland’s medical cannabis regulation exempts qualifying medical sales to patients and registered caregivers from sales and use tax. Adult-use purchases follow a different tax rule.

A 2026 Department of Legislative Services fiscal note explains that the state increased its adult-use cannabis tax from 9 percent to 12 percent beginning in fiscal 2026. An older price comparison using the original rate can therefore give the wrong impression of checkout cost.

For someone looking at a menu, the useful comparison is the final price after any applicable discount and tax, with the correct purchasing status. A percentage-off headline alone does not provide that amount, and the announcement does not give a universal final price for every product.

What to confirm before Friday

The address and ribbon-cutting time are the simplest starting points. Confirm the day’s program with the store, bring the identification required for the intended purchase and distinguish regular opening hours from the celebration’s individual activities. People using the medical program should also confirm current patient-service arrangements.

The opening adds a community occasion around an existing retail operation. Its immediate value is local: a chance to meet the operators and understand the store’s service. The wider consumer lesson is equally practical—event details, discounts and medical rules each deserve their own check before a cannabis shopping trip.

Illustrative stock main street; not the Rooted × ReLeaf store or its grand opening. Photo: Artūras Kokorevas / Pexels.

Continue Reading

Trending

Join The Cannabis Aficionado Community!
Join the Cannabis Aficionado community and receive all of the most relevant news geared towards our sophisticated enthusiast community.
Loading

Copyright ©️ 2026 Cannabis Aficionado. Cannabis Aficionado is a registered trademark of CNM Inc. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Cookies Policy. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services. Offers may be subject to change without notice.